Supreme Court Declines To Hear Michelle Carter’s Appeal In Texting Suicide Case


The U.S. Supreme Court said Monday that it will not consider an appeal by Michelle Carter, the Massachusetts woman who was sentenced to 15 months in prison for relentlessly pressuring her then-boyfriend in text messages to kill himself.

Carter, who was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in the 2014 death of 18-year-old Conrad Roy, had argued that her actions were a matter of free speech protected by the First Amendment.

A series of text messages sent between the couple on the night Roy died showed Carter, then 17, repeatedly urging a suicidal Roy to kill himself by carbon monoxide poisoning in his truck, even after he told her he no longer wanted to go through with it.

Michelle Carter, seen during her trial, was convicted of involuntary manslaughter for encouraging 18-year-old Conrad Roy

Michelle Carter, seen during her trial, was convicted of involuntary manslaughter for encouraging 18-year-old Conrad Roy III to kill himself in July 2014.

“You always say you’re gonna do it, but you never do,” she said in one text to him after he expressed hesitation, according to arrest documents. “I just want to make sure tonight is the real thing.”

In a later conversation with a friend, Carter admitted that she ordered Roy in a phone call to get back into his vehicle when he became frightened and wanted to call it off.

“Instructing Mr. Roy to get back in the truck constituted wanton and reckless conduct,” a Bristol County Juvenile Court judge ruled in 2017.

Her attorneys have continued to argue, however, that “her words alone” aren’t enough to blame for his death.

“The trial judge’s verdict and the [state Supreme Court] affirmance leave no doubt that Carter was convicted for her words alone ― what she said and failed to say to Roy. Carter neither provided Roy with the means of his death nor physically participated in his suicide,” her lawyers told the court, according to ABC News.

Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, who argued against Carter’s petition for an appeal in November, echoed the previous court’s ruling in the case that wanton or reckless conduct that causes a person’s death constitutes involuntary manslaughter and that speech that’s integral to crime is not protected by the First Amendment.

“Inasmuch as petitioner’s wanton or reckless conduct causing Roy’s death was carried out by speech, that speech was therefore unprotected because it was integral to the commission of involuntary manslaughter,” Healey’s petition stated, while also calling Carter’s First Amendment conflict “illusory.”

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Post

What Surprised Me Most About Living Together

I have a confession… Before my boyfriend moved in, I worried. I worried a lot. It happened slowly and then all at once. For over a year, we were content with our separate living situations. Then one day, there was a suggestion, followed by a conversation, and suddenly, things were […]